By Anna Claire Vollers, Stateline.org
Dr. Fred Levin has been watching with rising alarm the nationwide debate round federal cuts to Medicaid. He’s answerable for the medical care of about 100 older adults on the Group PACE heart in rural Newaygo, Michigan. For his sufferers, Medicaid isn’t only a security web — it’s a matter of life or demise.
“If left to see to their own needs, a lot of them would stay in their homes and would slowly die,” he stated. “They wouldn’t be able to get to their doctors’ appointments unless they had a family member to help. They wouldn’t get social care. They wouldn’t have people coming into their homes and seeing the bed bugs or the lice in their hair. They wouldn’t get their medications.”
The care at Group PACE is paid for by Medicaid, the state-federal medical insurance program for folks with low incomes or sure disabilities, and Medicare, the federal insurance coverage program for folks 65 and older. The middle is a one-stop store that gives medical and social providers to older adults through the day, permitting them to proceed residing safely of their houses.
If Congress cuts funding to Medicaid, Levin expects his heart would in all probability shut. In contrast to conventional nursing dwelling care, which state Medicaid applications are required by federal regulation to cowl, the providers at PACE facilities like his are an non-compulsory profit that 33 states have opted to cowl.
Across the nation, docs, lawmakers, advocates and sufferers are watching anxiously as Republicans in Congress contemplate proposals to slash billions of {dollars} from federal Medicaid funding as they give the impression of being to offset trillions in proposed tax cuts. The precise nature of the funding cuts are nonetheless being hammered out. However any reductions to federal Medicaid spending would shift these prices to states.
The extra monetary burden might blow billion-dollar holes in state budgets, forcing state lawmakers to slash well being advantages or prohibit who’s eligible for them. Practically a fifth of Individuals depend on Medicaid, and the share is even greater in some states.
“There are a lot of people who don’t pay attention to this because they think it doesn’t affect them personally,” Levin stated. “But 1 in 4 people in Michigan are on Medicaid. It’s very likely you have friends or family on Medicaid.”
Practically all Individuals over age 65 are coated by Medicare, which Republicans have pledged to not contact. Medicare doesn’t cowl most nursing dwelling or different long-term care, nonetheless. Neither does most personal insurance coverage.
However Medicaid does.
“If you have an older adult in your life who has been in a nursing home or received help at home with cooking, bathing, dressing, chances are Medicaid was involved,” stated Natalie Kean, director of federal well being advocacy for Justice in Ageing, an advocacy group centered on addressing poverty amongst older folks.
“Many of us have a connection to the program or will one day,” she stated.
A divided entrance
Conservatives have lengthy argued for decreasing the attain of Medicaid. They are saying this system is simply too costly and that its growth underneath the Reasonably priced Care Act, often known as Obamacare, diverts an excessive amount of cash towards able-bodied adults and away from the extra weak populations it was initially supposed to assist.
However coverage specialists say that decreasing protection for some Medicaid recipients, such because the working adults who received protection underneath growth applications, can have ripple results on weak teams similar to kids and older adults.
Republicans aren’t united in a want to see huge cuts.
Final month, Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican governor in a purple state, publicly known as on Congress to not slash Medicaid funding.
Final week, Washington Republican state Rep. Michelle Caldier wrote a letter to Trump asking him to rethink cuts to Medicaid and expressing her concern concerning the giant variety of navy retirees and senior residents in her district.
Caldier, a dentist who has labored with nursing dwelling sufferers, advised Stateline she believes the most certainly cuts could be a discount within the quantity the federal authorities matches state spending for working adults who’re coated underneath Medicaid growth. That, she stated, would have little influence on older adults.
“The only caveat is that I am very worried that the leadership in our state does not have a good relationship with our president,” Caldier stated. Democrats management the workplaces of governor and each legislative chambers in Washington state. Caldier worries that if Washington lawmakers defy the president over points similar to gender-affirming take care of transgender youth, the feds might retaliate by slashing their Medicaid funds to the state.
“If we got into a political match with the president, we would lose, no matter how you slice or dice it,” she stated.
In Idaho, Republican state lawmakers shot down a invoice that probably would have repealed Medicaid growth, earlier than passing one that may introduce sweeping coverage adjustments in an effort to manage prices.
Even in Congress, some Republicans are balking, publicly defending Medicaid and warning concerning the penalties of deep cuts. Some who’ve excessive percentages of Medicaid recipients of their districts have urged celebration leaders to not minimize funding for this system and have vowed to vote towards any funds plan that does so.
Medicaid covers 72 million Individuals. A majority of American adults, together with two-thirds of Republicans, say they need Congress to both keep present Medicaid spending or enhance it, based on a February 2025 ballot from KFF, a well being coverage analysis group.
President Donald Trump has stated in latest months that he received’t contact Medicaid. However final month, U.S. Home Republicans pushed by a funds plan, now into account within the Senate, that requires about $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid over the following decade to assist counterbalance the Trump administration’s desired $4.5 trillion in tax cuts.
Going through cuts that giant, states must determine which advantages to cut in an effort to maintain their budgets balanced, which is a constitutional requirement in most states.
Older adults and folks with disabilities already account for greater than half of states’ Medicaid spending, on common. In some states, together with Alabama, Florida, Kansas, Mississippi and North Dakota, these teams account for two-thirds of state Medicaid spending.
Idaho state Sen. Melissa Wintrow, a Democrat on the state Senate Well being & Welfare committee, stated her greatest concern is Congress decreasing the federal match fee. That is the sum of money the federal authorities chips in to assist states pay for Medicaid. How a lot a state receives primarily depends upon how rich its residents are. Richer states similar to California and Connecticut get much less assist, whereas poorer states get extra.
In Idaho, on the poorer finish of the spectrum, the feds pay about 67% of conventional Medicaid prices and 90% of Medicaid growth prices.
“It is all a domino effect,” Wintrow stated. The federal authorities covers about $3 billion of Idaho’s $4.2 billion Medicaid funds. “If the feds start chopping that off, it’s going to impact everything.”
Chopping care at dwelling
All state Medicaid applications have opted to cowl a minimum of some home-based and neighborhood care, similar to dwelling well being aides who help folks with bathing, toileting and different each day residing actions, transportation and grownup day care.
Kean and different specialists fear that as a result of federal regulation doesn’t require state Medicaid applications to cowl home-based care, state lawmakers would possibly sharply cut back spending on these providers — and even eradicate protection.
“When states have budget shortfalls, they start to tighten eligibility for the home-based programs,” stated Kean. “We’re certain those would be the first to go if federal funding is cut for Medicaid.”
Paying for home-based providers out of pocket would exhaust the median Medicare recipient’s financial savings in lower than two years, based on KFF.
The median value of a yr of a full-time aide to assist is about $62,400, far above the median earnings for Individuals over 65, which is about $36,000. The median life financial savings for Medicare beneficiaries was $103,800 in 2023.
House-based providers are a well-liked profit for state Medicaid applications, as a result of most enrollees favor to stay of their houses. And regardless of the expense, dwelling care could be less expensive than nursing houses — about $38,000 vs. almost $54,000 per yr in 2021, based on a KFF evaluation.
Chopping Medicaid additionally might make it more durable to recruit and maintain a workforce of nursing dwelling and residential well being staff.
Over the previous two years, most states — even these led by Republicans — elevated their Medicaid cost charges for these providers, in an effort to fight the nationwide scarcity of long-term care employees.
However federal funding cuts might jeopardize what states are capable of pay these employees.
“There’s already a direct-care workforce crisis,” Kean stated. “Even if eligibility isn’t directly cut or programs aren’t cut, there wouldn’t be enough workers to provide that care. At home and in nursing facilities, the quality of care will go down.”
In rural Michigan, Levin stated the PACE heart the place he works employs about 100 folks. Its closure would influence not solely these employees, but in addition would imply his sufferers could be left to seek out transportation and different well being providers on their very own, even when these providers are nonetheless coated by Medicaid.
“Without access in rural areas, how are these individuals going to get to the bigger cities where they can get to their health care? It’s going to overwhelm other parts of the health care system,” Levin stated.
“Everybody’s going to be responsible for taking care of the people who don’t have health insurance, in some indirect way or another. It’s going to affect us all.”
Stateline reporter Anna Claire Vollers could be reached at avollers@stateline.org.
©2025 States Newsroom. Go to at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.
Initially Revealed:
