By Bernard Wolfson | KFF Well being Information
In 2017, the Republicans who managed Congress tried mightily to slash federal spending on Medicaid, the government-funded well being program masking low-income households and people.
California, like different states, relies upon closely on federal {dollars} to supply take care of its poorest residents. Analyzes on the time confirmed the GOP’s proposals would minimize Medicaid funds flowing from Washington by tens of billions of {dollars}, maybe much more, forcing state officers to rethink the scope of Medi-Cal.
However the GOP efforts resulted in failure — iconically crystallized by Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, sick with terminal mind most cancers, issuing his decisive early-morning thumbs-down.
Greater than seven years later, right here we go once more.
With Donald Trump getting ready to reenter the White Home, bolstered as soon as extra by Republican majorities in each homes of Congress, expectations are excessive that the GOP will rapidly resurrect its long-desired aim of chopping Medicaid.
Republicans need to finance massive tax cuts, and the GOP platform underneath Trump pledges to not contact Social Safety or Medicare. To make certain, that’s not set in stone. However for now, as my KFF colleagues have famous, Medicaid appears an terrible lot like low-hanging fruit. (KFF is a well being data nonprofit that features KFF Well being Information.)
Well being officers in California and throughout the nation are on edge about the opportunity of large-scale Medicaid cuts being enacted as quickly as subsequent yr. Such cuts would have an outsize affect within the Golden State, whose 14.7 million Medi-Cal enrollees exceed the complete populations of all however three different US states. Medi-Cal offers well being protection for over 40% of the state’s kids and pays for practically 40% of births. It’s a essential supply of funding for security internet hospitals and neighborhood clinics.
And over 60% of its $161 billion price range this yr comes through Washington.
The potential for giant federal cuts to Medicaid might have been a consider Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s determination to name a particular session of the state legislature this week.
California might search to offset a pointy drop in federal {dollars} with larger taxes or cuts to different state applications. However each these choices might be politically untenable. That’s why many well being specialists suppose leaders in Sacramento would nearly actually have to contemplate shrinking Medi-Cal.
That might imply chopping any variety of optionally available advantages , corresponding to dental providers, optometry, and bodily remedy. It may also imply rolling again among the formidable Medi-Cal growth you will have undertaken in recent times. That might embody some features of California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal, a $12 billion program of providers that deal with sufferers’ social and financial wants along with their medical wants.
Some observers concern federal cuts might have an effect on the roughly 1.5 million immigrants dwelling within the US with out authorization who’re enrolled in Medi-Cal at an annual value of over $6 billion, practically all of it funded by the state. However others say a extra probably route could be to scale back funds throughout the board to the managed care plans that cowl 94% of Medi-Cal enrollees, relatively than goal any particular teams of individuals.
“Medicaid is on the chopping block, and I don’t think that’s speculation,” says Gerald Kominski, a senior fellow on the UCLA Heart for Well being Coverage Analysis. “It is widely viewed by potential members of Trump’s administration as a program that is too broad and needs to be brought under control.”
Whether or not they can succeed this time stays to be seen. However extra on that later.
Individuals who have adopted earlier GOP efforts to downsize Medicaid say quite a lot of beforehand tried strategies is likely to be again on the desk this time. They may embody outright caps on federal Medicaid {dollars}; elimination of the core Inexpensive Care Act coverage underneath which the feds pay 90% of the price of increasing protection to a wider swath of low-income adults; a piece requirement, which might depress enrollment; and rule modifications supposed to make it tougher for states to attract federal Medicaid {dollars} by using taxes on well being care insurers referred to as MCOs.
The primary Trump administration proposed however later dropped modifications to the foundations governing such taxes. If related modifications have been adopted this time round, they might trigger monetary complications in California, which has often used MCO taxes to offset Medi-Cal spending from state coffers.
Proposition 35, not too long ago handed by California voters, is also in danger. The initiative requires the MCO tax to turn into a everlasting fixture in 2027, pending federal approval, with the aim of financing billions of {dollars} in new Medi-Cal spending, primarily to extend funding for medical doctors and different suppliers. A federal rule change might upend these intentions.
Termination of the federal authorities’s 90% protection of the ACA Medicaid growth would put a gaping gap within the Medi-Cal price range. Medi-Cal spent over $34 billion in fiscal yr 2023 masking the roughly 5 million individuals who enrolled because of the growth, and practically $31 billion of that quantity was paid by the federal authorities.
If the feds’ share dropped again to its common Medi-Cal charge of fifty%, California must pony up practically $14 billion extra to maintain the growth enrollees lined — and that’s only for a yr.
A extra formidable GOP push, together with each spending caps and a rollback of federal help for the Medicaid growth, might actually ship California officers scrambling.
In 2017, the state’s Division of Well being Care Providers issued an evaluation exhibiting {that a} legislative proposal filed by a bunch of Republican U.S. senators to cap Medicaid spending and finish enhanced funding for the ACA growth, together with another cuts, would lead to practically $139 billion of misplaced federal funding to California from 2020 to 2027.
“There are almost limitless changes state leaders could make to Medi-Cal if they are forced to do that,” says David Kane, a senior lawyer on the Western Heart on Regulation & Poverty. “And we fear that burden will almost certainly hurt poor people and immigrants the most.”
However huge Medicaid cuts should not a foregone conclusion. In any case, when Trump was within the White Home in 2017, Republicans additionally had Home and Senate majorities and nonetheless didn’t obtain their aim. The political stars might be aligning otherwise this time, however the GOP has solely a razor-thin majority within the Home.
A decade into the ACA’s Medicaid growth, some 21 million individuals throughout the nation have protection by it, embedding this system extra deeply within the nation’s well being care panorama. Based on a 2023 examine from Georgetown College, Medicaid and the associated Kids’s Well being Insurance coverage Program cowl the next proportion of the inhabitants in rural counties than in city ones. And as we all know, rural America leans strongly Republican.
Will GOP members of Congress, confronted with a vote on chopping Medicaid, buck their very own constituents?
Edwin Park, one of many authors of that Georgetown examine, thinks there’s an opportunity huge cuts could be seen. “Large numbers of Americans are either on Medicaid, have family members on Medicaid, or know someone on Medicaid,” says Park, a analysis professor at Georgetown’s McCourt Faculty of Public Coverage. “Hopefully its popularity and its importance will win the day.”
“Asking Never Hurts” is a sequence of columns by Bernard J. Wolfson addressing the challenges customers face in California’s well being care panorama.
This text was produced by KFF Well being Information , which publishes California Healthline , an editorially impartial service of the California Well being Care Basis .
Initially Printed:
